Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 10 July 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 10 JULY 2014

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Dorset Council
v
Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Dorset Council
v
Jaffa Strategic Design Pty Ltd

2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Davis
v
Ayers and Anor

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania is set to hear several cases on July 10, 2014, covering both criminal and civil matters. One notable case involves Stephen Roy Standage, scheduled for a part-heard trial in Court 8, presided over by Justice Estcourt. The case is listed under criminal jurisdiction, indicating it involves a criminal matter. Another significant case pertains to Dorset Council versus Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal, to be heard in Court 3 before Associate Justice Holt. This case falls under civil jurisdiction and involves a judgment on an appeal related to resource management and planning.

The legal issues at the heart of these cases likely involve the interpretation of statutory provisions and administrative law principles in the context of planning appeals and resource management. The court will need to address whether the decisions made by the tribunal were lawful, reasonable, and in accordance with the relevant statutes. For the criminal case, the court will consider whether the prosecution has met its burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The reasoning and outcome will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented by both parties.

In the civil case, the court's decision will be influenced by the merits of the appeal, the correctness of the tribunal's interpretation of the law, and the adequacy of the reasons provided. For the criminal case, the court will assess the evidence and arguments to determine the defendant's culpability. The final orders will reflect the court's determination on these issues, potentially leading to the affirmation, reversal, or modification of the tribunal's decision in the civil case, and a verdict in the criminal case.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 10 July 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established