Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 7 October 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 202


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 7 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Enter Judgment

L V Property Investments Pty Ltd  v Liang & Anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 7 October 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 202
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 202
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving L V Property Investments Pty Ltd, which brought proceedings against Liang and another defendant. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the extract, but it was scheduled for judgment. The matter was listed for hearing in Court 3, located at Salamanca Place in Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt. The proceedings were part of the civil jurisdiction and were scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. There were no listed matters for Launceston or Burnie on the specified date.

The legal issues before the court involved determining the outcome of the proceedings between L V Property Investments Pty Ltd and the defendants. The specifics of the dispute were not outlined in the extract, but the court was required to consider the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to make a judgment. The court's role was to interpret the applicable laws and apply them to the facts of the case to reach a decision.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided extract. However, the court's decision would have been based on a thorough examination of the evidence and legal arguments. Associate Justice Holt would have assessed the credibility of the witnesses, the weight of the evidence, and the relevant legal principles to arrive at a judgment. The outcome would have been communicated to the parties involved, and the court's decision would have been recorded in the official court records.

No additional matters were listed beyond the judgment in this case. The final orders would have been communicated directly to the parties involved, and any appeals or further proceedings would have been subject to the court's subsequent directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.