SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 4 MAY 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Robert Raymond Kaye
Jessica Anne Duffey
Brendan Lee Jones
For Mention or Plea
James Michael Fitzgerald
Damian William Walsh
For Bail Consent
Daniel Peter Leonard Thorne
Brendon John Clapp
Gail Schupp
Emma Louise Hall
Damien Ashley Thomas
12:15 pm
For Mention
Darren James Ford
2:15 pm
For Mention
Tanya Maree Silva
JSWR
For Plea
Dean Phillip Braslin
MEH
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Leah Lesley Cannon
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Sentence
Craig John Wilson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert John Smith
(Part Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Trial
Megavar Pty Ltd
v
Colin David Johns
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Watkins
v
NBN Co Limited
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Noel Marcus Smith
For Trial
Michael James Bunch
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 4 May 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 84
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 84
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal proceedings, including preliminary hearings, pleas, and sentencing. For instance, Robert Raymond Kaye, Jessica Anne Duffey, and Brendan Lee Jones were listed for a mention or plea, indicating that the court would determine whether they would plead guilty or not guilty, and if so, the next steps in their respective cases. Another significant matter was the sentence hearing for Craig John Wilson, where the court would determine the appropriate punishment following a conviction.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but typically, the court would consider evidence, legal arguments, and applicable laws to reach a decision. Each case would be evaluated on its merits, ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the legal standards and precedents of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The final orders and outcomes for each case would be documented in the court's records, which would be available for legal reference and follow-up.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.