SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 3 DECEMBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Stuart Barry Russell
(Part-heard)
4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
John Lewis Seckold
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Luke David Buck
Jason Charles Dare
Andrew Darrel Legge
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Joseph Andrew Edwards
Mark William Eather
For Investigation into Fitness to Stand Trial
Raymond Leigh Silva
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
Henki Bire
Safrudin Wotu
Sulaiman Bin Marhaban
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
Discovery/Directions Hearing
Allison v Hill
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am For Directions Hearing
Matthew Vernon Garcie
For Plea
Mark Anthony Williamson
Adrian Robert Wickham
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15pm For Judgment
Senior Sergeant John Parker v Stacey Amanda Bessell
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am For Mention
William Colin Drake
For Backstop Trial
Mark Aulich
For Trial
Cyrus Francis Halfacre
Guthrie Gene Halfacre
2.15pm For Re-Sentence
For Application
Thai Michael Davern
4pm For Sentencing Submissions
BKP
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 3 December 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 236
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 236
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed a wide range of matters, including trial proceedings, bail applications, fitness to stand trial investigations, and sentencing submissions. Each case presented unique challenges and considerations, requiring the court to address specific legal principles and precedents relevant to the circumstances of each defendant. The court's decisions in these matters would hinge on thorough evaluations of the evidence presented, applicable laws, and the defendants' rights under the legal framework.
In its reasoning, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence and arguments presented in each case. For instance, in the case of Stuart Barry Russell, the court likely considered the prosecution's case and the defence's counterarguments. Similarly, for John Lewis Seckold's bail application, the court assessed the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court if released and the potential risk to the community. The outcomes of these hearings would have direct implications on the defendants' legal standings and future court appearances. The final orders of the court would reflect the judicial determinations made in each case, ensuring that justice was served according to the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.