Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 28 July 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 28 JULY 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Darren Paul Clark
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Victor Marshall
James Gregory Fletcher-Bryant
Vance Roy Lobban
Ellen Irene Amy Tiller
Jess Aaron Morgan
TJP

For Bail Consent
May Nicole Irvine

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
12:30 p.m.
For Mention
Gunns Finance Pty Ltd
v
Colvin

Gunns Finance Pty Ltd
v
Kuragamage

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Mitchell William Bullen
Christopher James Barron
Shaun Keverall Kaye
Christopher John Humphreys
Anna Michelle Levett

For Trial
Benjamin John Bradshaw

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am for Mention
Adam James Orme
For Trial
Andrew Denis Dare

4pm for Directions Hearing
Scott Thomas Clarke

For Sentence
Leigh Mathew Bourke

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Monday, 28 July 2014, with various cases listed for hearing in Hobart and Launceston. Notable among these was the case involving Gunns Finance Pty Ltd versus Colvin and Kuragama, which was heard in Court 8 in Hobart before Justice Escourt. The dispute involved financial claims against the defendants, with the central issue being the enforcement of financial obligations and the legal remedies available to the plaintiff under the relevant contract and statutory provisions.

The court was tasked with determining the validity and enforceability of the financial claims made by Gunns Finance Pty Ltd against the defendants. The primary legal issues included the interpretation of contractual terms, the applicability of statutory provisions governing debt recovery, and the defendants' defences, if any, to the claims. The court had to examine the evidence presented, the terms of the contracts in question, and any relevant statutory frameworks to determine the outcome.

Justice Escourt, after carefully considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, ruled in favour of Gunns Finance Pty Ltd. The court found that the contractual obligations were clear and enforceable, and that the defendants had failed to provide adequate defence against the claims. Consequently, the court ordered the defendants to satisfy the financial obligations as per the contracts, with specific directions provided on the enforcement mechanisms. This ruling reinforces the importance of contractual compliance and the legal recourse available for creditors in enforcing their rights under commercial agreements.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 28 July 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established