Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 26 August 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 165


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 26 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Bevan William Parkinson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Mark Leigh Freeman

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 26 August 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 165
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 165
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, heard two cases on Monday, 26 August 2013. Bevan William Parkinson and Mark Leigh Freeman were both due for sentencing in Court 7, located at Salamanca Place in Hobart. Justice ESTCOURT was responsible for presiding over the case of Parkinson, while Justice PEARCE was the presiding judge for Freeman. Launceston and Burnie did not have scheduled lists for that day.

The primary legal issues in these cases pertained to the appropriate sentencing for each individual. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate penalties and sentences for the respective criminal activities committed by Parkinson and Freeman, considering the relevant legal frameworks, sentencing principles, and the circumstances surrounding each case.

The reasoning and outcomes of these cases are not detailed in the provided extract. However, the fact that the cases were listed for sentencing indicates that the court had already heard and decided on the guilt of the defendants. It is expected that the court would have considered various factors such as the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances before delivering their sentencing decisions.

The final orders of the court, including the specific sentences handed down to Parkinson and Freeman, are not provided in the extract. However, the sentences would have been determined based on the legal principles and guidelines applicable to the respective cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.