Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 24 August 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 24 AUGUST 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Alan Quarmby
v
Barrie Graeme Oakley and anor

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Dispute Facts Hearing
Aaron Henderson Gray

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Lokendra Singh

In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application by video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Damian Mark Stebbings

Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Chambers
9:30 a.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Brodie Leigh Price

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Adjournment Application
Michelle Byrne and Anor
v
Robert Town and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15pm For Bail Application by video link
From Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Damian Mark Stebbings

BURNIE

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
From Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lokendra Singh

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a hearing on Monday, August 24, 2015, involving several criminal and civil cases. The court presided over by the Full Court dealt with a case between Alan Quarmby and Barrie Graeme Oakley, with an additional party. The court's criminal jurisdiction was engaged in multiple hearings, including a facts dispute hearing, a directions hearing via video link, a bail application via video link, and a telephone directions hearing. The civil jurisdiction was also engaged in an adjournment application involving Michelle Byrne and another party against Robert Town and another party.

The legal issues before the court involved various criminal and civil matters, including the interpretation and application of legal principles relevant to the specific cases. For instance, in the Quarmby v Oakley case, the court had to determine the validity of the claims made by Quarmby against Oakley and the additional party. In the criminal cases, the court needed to assess the facts and directions of the cases, as well as the eligibility for bail. The adjournment application required the court to decide whether to grant the requested adjournment and under what conditions.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases varied, depending on the specific legal issues involved. In the Quarmby v Oakley case, the court would have evaluated the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles to arrive at a decision. For the criminal cases, the court would have considered the facts and directions provided and assessed the merits of the bail applications. In the adjournment application, the court would have considered the reasons for the adjournment and determined whether it was justified under the circumstances. The final orders of the court would have been based on the court's assessment of the evidence, arguments, and applicable legal principles.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 24 August 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established