SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
JWA
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
10:00 a.m.
Matthew Allen Parker
For Mention
Jack Owen Read
Samuel Alfred Watterson
For Bail Consent
SJB
Jamie Leigh Feil
Joshua Charles Hay
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Greg Prestage
4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Samuel David William Maple
James Craig McInerney
Jenna Lee Emery
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 2 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 238
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 238
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that came before the court encompassed procedural directions in ongoing criminal cases, bail applications, and the consideration of consent to bail. The court had to address the logistics of conducting hearings via video-link for prisoners and evaluate the merits of bail applications based on the circumstances of each case. The bail applications, in particular, required the court to weigh factors such as the severity of the alleged offence, the risk of reoffending, and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court.
Justice Tennent addressed the directions hearing by outlining the procedural steps for the case involving JWA, ensuring that all parties were aware of the upcoming schedule and requirements. In the bail applications, the court assessed the risk factors associated with releasing the accused on bail and considered representations from both the prosecution and defence. Ultimately, the court decided to grant bail to some applicants while denying it to others based on the specific circumstances and risk assessments. The final orders were made accordingly, reflecting the court's determination on each application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.