Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 2 May 2016 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 2 MAY 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Kyam Keith Broadby
Benjamin Angus Shield

For Trial
Aaron Roy Johnston
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Trial

Aaron Leonard Townsend

(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.

For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex

David Luke Pearson

For Mention

Amy Elizabeth Russell

Brendan Lee Jones

For Application to Discharge a Dangerous Criminal Declaration

Kevin Richard Bell

For Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence

George Maryon

For Bail Application

In Court as in Chambers

4:00 p.m.

Mathew Parkinson

Maxwell Alexander Jacques

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
State of Tasmania
v
Stephen James Bygrave

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Public Trustee
v
Kenneth Drake

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Mitchaell Leonard Daking Millier
Jacob Adam Williams
Derek George Arnol

To Follow
For Trial
David Ronald Morgan

4:15pm For Plea
Ricky Lee Smith-Towns

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
BLP
Rodney Charles Popowski

For Trial (Part Heard)
Gavin Richard Baldwin

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on Monday, 2 May 2016. In the criminal jurisdiction, various individuals appeared for mention and trial. These included Kyam Keith Broadby, Benjamin Angus Shield, Aaron Roy Johnston, Aaron Leonard Townsend, David Luke Pearson, Amy Elizabeth Russell, Brendan Lee Jones, Kevin Richard Bell, George Maryon, and Mathew Parkinson. The court also handled applications related to dangerous criminal declarations, bail, and the review of suspended sentences. In the civil jurisdiction, cases were heard in Hobart and Launceston, including matters involving the State of Tasmania against Stephen James Bygrave and the Public Trustee against Kenneth Drake.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a wide range of criminal and civil matters. For the criminal cases, these included pleas, bail applications, and the continuation of trials. In the civil cases, issues ranged from the enforcement of state laws to disputes involving the Public Trustee. The court had to consider the evidence and arguments presented in each case to determine appropriate outcomes, including the continuation of trials, the granting or denial of bail, and the resolution of civil disputes.

The court's reasoning and outcomes varied according to the nature of each case. In criminal cases, decisions were made on the basis of the evidence presented, the legal arguments, and the applicable laws. Bail applications were assessed on the likelihood of the accused appearing in court and any potential risk to the community. Civil cases involved the interpretation of legal principles and the application of relevant statutes. The court's decisions were guided by legal precedents and the specifics of each case.

The final orders issued by the court would have addressed the immediate needs of each case, including the continuation of trials, the granting or denial of bail, and the resolution of civil disputes. The court ensured that all legal processes were followed and that the rights of the parties involved were upheld.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 2 May 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established