Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 2 July 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 2 JULY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Daniel Luke Pelham
Gary Robert Greig
Dean Rodney Scott

For Bail Consent
Alexander Peter Cooper

For Trial
Matthew John Townsend
(Part heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions
Tamara Jayne Gallahar

For Trial
IPP
(Part-heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
4.30 p.m.
For Judgment
Ivan Anthony
v
Maxam Australia Pty Ltd
The Queen
v
Registrar of the Magistrates Court of Tasmania at Burnie,
Ex parte, Ivan Anthony

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Leave to Proceed
Jones v State of Tasmania

12:00 p.m.
Discovery
Verity v Smith

12:30 p.m.
Enter Judgment
Teidemann v MAIB & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Leigh David Newton
Jarret Anthony McCall
Teena Louise Kelly
Thomas James Aliano
Christopher John Humphreys

For Trial
Michael John Jones

BURNIE

No List for Burnie

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a matter was listed for judgment involving Ivan Anthony against Maxam Australia Pty Ltd. The nature of the dispute pertained to legal proceedings initiated by Ivan Anthony against Maxam Australia Pty Ltd. The case was presided over by Justice Wood, who was tasked with delivering judgment on the matter. The central legal issue before the court was to determine the rights and obligations of the parties involved in the litigation and to provide a resolution based on the evidence and legal arguments presented.

Justice Wood approached the case by meticulously reviewing the submissions, evidence, and legal principles applicable to the dispute. The court considered the specific claims made by Ivan Anthony and the defences or counter-claims presented by Maxam Australia Pty Ltd. After evaluating the arguments and applying relevant legal standards, the court arrived at a decision that addressed the substantive issues raised in the litigation. The outcome of the judgment was designed to provide a definitive resolution to the dispute, ensuring that the rights and obligations of both parties were appropriately recognised and enforced.

The final orders of the court reflected the comprehensive analysis and deliberation undertaken in the judgment. Justice Wood's decision provided clarity and direction for the parties involved, resolving the legal issues at hand and ensuring that the matter was concluded in a fair and legally sound manner. The judgment not only addressed the immediate dispute but also contributed to the legal framework governing similar cases in the future.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 2 July 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established