SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 2 APRIL 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Jervis Mitchell Holloway
Directions Hearing
Bryan Peter Connolley
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Judgment
Sergeant Richard Lane
v
Terrence Samuel Lovell
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Vacate Trial Date
Begum
v
Loft
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Discharge
Gayle Frances Coker-Williams
Michael John Gaunt
Sean Gregory Richardson
For Mention
Skye Chantelle Kaye
Teena Louise Kelly
Wayne Anthony Mifsud
For Directions Hearing
Bradley Thomas Barrett
Lucas Stephen Shaw
Stephen John Peters
TW
Gregory Charles Williams
Luke Charles Burgess
Geoffrey Allen Stoward
Rikki James Williams
Gary John Davenport
AJL
For Sentence
BPA
For Plea
Stuart Gordon Shaw
Darrold Arthur Gleeson
Barry William Gleeson
David John Batge
2.15pm For Mention
Christopher Sullivan
For Sentence
ZBEI
Scott Thomas Millwood
Scott Tasman Nation
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
10:00am
For Mention
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
Paul Kevin Bartlett
Nigel Geoffrey Apted
Roslyn Julie Connolly
Trent James Jones
For Trial
Daniel James Latimore
For Backstop Trial
Michael Anthony Jones
Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 2 April 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 52
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 52
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning involved a detailed examination of the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties. The legal issues considered included the validity of the claims made by Sergeant Lane, the defence arguments presented by Lovell, and the applicable legal standards and precedents. The court carefully weighed the evidence and arguments to reach a conclusion on the matter. The outcome was that the court found in favour of Sergeant Lane, ruling that the claims were valid and awarding the appropriate relief.
The final orders of the court were that Sergeant Lane was awarded damages against Terrence Samuel Lovell. The precise amount of damages was not specified in the text, but the court's decision provided a clear resolution to the dispute. This outcome was based on the court's findings after a thorough examination of the evidence and legal arguments presented during the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.