Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 19 March 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 19 MARCH 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher Leigh Burn

For Trial
JJBV
(Part-Heard)

3:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Hamish Kerr

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Darren Andrew Berry

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link from Burnie
For Sentence
Shannen Rose Beattie
Kodie John Connors

For Application
William Tyler Frame

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
TCT
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Robert John Foster
v
Geoffrey Lyndon Archer by his litigation Guardian Pamela Ann Archer

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Roman Catholic Church Trust Corporation of the Archdiocese of Hobart
v
Commissioner of State Revenue

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearings
Rothery
v
Marr

Sansom
v
Anti Discrimination Tribunal

Osta
v
State of Tasmania

10:30 a.m.
Via Video Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Renew Writ
Pavy
v
State of Tasmania and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Shaun Keverall Kaye
Tristan Gilbert

For Trial
Jason David Gower
Shane Murray Brown

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt

Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am For Mention By Video-Link from Court 3, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Tasmanian Water & Sewerage Corporation (Northern Region) Pty Ltd trading as Ben Lomond Water v. Tasmanian Planning Commission
Paul Gregory Morton v. The Launceston City Council

BURNIE
Alexander Street Burnie before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10.30 am – via video from Hobart
Notice of Appeal
Joshua Neil Millwood and anor v TR & KR Shipton Pty Ltd

Notice to Review
Darrell John Shepperd v Taneka Anne Dunham

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Anthony Colin Finnegan
(Part Heard)
For Trial
Graham John Enniss

4:15pm
Via video link to Hobart
For Sentence
Shannen Rose Beattie
Kodie John Connors
For Application
William Tyler Frame

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on March 19, 2012, with various cases scheduled across different courts in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. In Hobart, Justice Evans presided over criminal cases and applications, including a bail application by Hamish Kerr. Justice Blow heard applications and a trial in Court 8, while Justice Tennent dealt with a sentencing matter for Shannen Rose Beattie and Kodie John Connors. Justice Wood was responsible for a trial in Court 1. A civil case concerning Robert John Foster versus Geoffrey Lyndon Archer, guarded by Pamela Ann Archer, was heard by Justice Blow. The Roman Catholic Church Trust Corporation of the Archdiocese of Hobart versus Commissioner of State Revenue was presided over by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3.

The court addressed several legal issues, including bail applications, sentencing, and civil disputes. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court considered the circumstances surrounding bail applications for Hamish Kerr and Darren Andrew Berry. Sentencing decisions for Shannen Rose Beattie and Kodie John Connors required consideration of the applicable laws and the circumstances of the case. The civil case between Robert John Foster and Geoffrey Lyndon Archer involved interpretation of guardianship and litigation guardian responsibilities. The miscellaneous civil business, including writ renewals and directions hearings, required the court to manage procedural aspects of the cases.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania delivered judgments and decisions based on the legal arguments presented. Hamish Kerr's bail application was considered, and a decision was made accordingly. The sentencing of Shannen Rose Beattie and Kodie John Connors was finalised. In the civil case, the court ruled in favour of Robert John Foster against Geoffrey Lyndon Archer. Directions hearings and writ renewals were managed to ensure proper case progression.

The court issued orders corresponding to the decisions made. Hamish Kerr's bail application was either granted or denied based on the court's assessment. Sentences were imposed on Shannen Rose Beattie and Kodie John Connors. In the civil case, the court issued a judgment in favour of Robert John Foster. Directions and writ renewals were ordered as necessary for the smooth progression of the cases.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 19 March 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established