Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 May 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 18 MAY 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Emma Louise Hall

4:15 p.m.
In Chambers
For Directions Hearing by Telephone
Stephen Roy Standage
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ethan Scott Cooper
CLC
Rowena Amy Worbey
Shayden James Cowen
Todd Athol Jackson
Jonathan Albert Swan
Nathan Lee Wechsler
Mohamad Bastoni
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar
Robert Raymond Kaye
Timothy James Little

For Bail Consent
Joseph Aaron Lattimer
Phillip Andrew Young

For Plea
Jason Linley Bell

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to
Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal and Ian Andrew Sharman

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Shaun Andrew Blake
Joshua Leslie Farrell

To Follow For Trial
Brodie Leigh Jones

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial
Shaun Andrew Blake

4:00pm For Bail Application
In Court as in Chambers
Jacob Adam Williams

BURNIE

Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal and Ian Andrew Sharman
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, held a hearing in the case of Stephen Roy Standage v The State of Tasmania. This case was heard before Justice Wood and pertained to criminal matters, with a directions hearing by telephone scheduled for 4:15 p.m. The dispute involved legal issues surrounding the procedural aspects of the case, focusing on the appropriate steps to be taken moving forward in the criminal proceedings against Standage.

The legal issues the court needed to address were primarily procedural in nature, focusing on the directions to be taken in the case against Standage. The court considered the appropriate legal processes to be followed, including the timing and method of the directions hearing and the implications for the ongoing case against the defendant.

The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that the legal process adhered to the procedural requirements set out by the criminal justice system. Justice Wood directed the case to proceed with the scheduled telephone hearing to ensure that the procedural integrity of the case was maintained. The outcome of the hearing was that the directions hearing would proceed as scheduled, with further instructions provided to the parties involved.

The final orders included the continuation of the directions hearing by telephone at the designated time and the implementation of any further procedural steps as directed by the court. This decision ensured that the case against Standage would progress in a manner that was both efficient and compliant with legal standards.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 May 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established