Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 February 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 18 FEBRUARY 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Trial
Darrel Henry Lockley
(Part Heard)

10.00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tu Ai Lin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Further Directions Hearing
CJC
Peter Stephen Bomford

Preliminary Proceedings Application
Damon Glenn Smith
Christopher Wayne Wakefield

For Plea
Verriece Aileen McLean

Bail Consent
Adrian Lloyd Reardon
Mathew Wayne Tennant

3.00 p.m.
For Plea
David Keith Blake

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Amend Defence/Apply R414
Osbourne Investments Pty Ltd as Trustee of the Family Trust & Anor
v
Top Form Enterprises Pty Ltd & Ors

Noon
Chamber Matter

12.30 p.m.
Costs
Giameos
v
Djekanovic

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Directions Hearing
The State of Tasmania v Christopher John Humphreys

Criminal Jurisdiction
For Mention
Christopher John Humphreys
Michael Vernon Lowe
Matthew Wayne Leslie
Glen Bamford

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Scott Cameron Parker

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Mention
Trent James Jones
Paul Kevin Bartlett
Scott Thomas Clarke

For Bail Consent
Brad Geoffrey Arnold

For Trial
BNT

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The law lists for Monday, 18 February 2013, include several cases before the Supreme Court of Tasmania and Magistrates Court. In the Supreme Court, a variety of matters were scheduled, including criminal trials, plea hearings, and directions hearings. Notable cases included a trial involving Darrel Henry Lockley, a directions hearing for Tu Ai Lin, and a plea hearing for Verriece Aileen McLean. Civil matters were also scheduled, such as an amend defence and application for Osbourne Investments Pty Ltd, and a costs case between Giameos and Djekanovic. In Launceston, the Chief Justice Crawford was to hear a directions hearing in the case of The State of Tasmania v Christopher John Humphreys, among other criminal matters.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a broad spectrum, ranging from criminal proceedings such as trials and pleas to civil matters like amendments to defences and applications for costs. Each case presented unique legal questions that required judicial interpretation and application of relevant laws. In criminal cases, the court had to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants based on the evidence presented and applicable legal standards. Civil cases involved the interpretation of contractual obligations, financial disputes, and procedural matters such as amendments to pleadings and cost allocations.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were documented in the law lists, although specific details of the judgments were not provided. The proceedings involved the application of statutory provisions, case law, and legal principles to the facts of each case. The outcomes would depend on how the evidence and legal arguments were evaluated by the justices and judges presiding over the cases. Each decision would reflect a careful consideration of the law and the circumstances of the individual matters.

The final orders and judgments would be communicated through official court documentation, which would detail the specific outcomes for each case, including any sentences, fines, or other legal remedies awarded or denied. These documents would provide a comprehensive account of the court's decisions and the legal reasoning behind them.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 February 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established