Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 17 February 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 27


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Fraser Catto
Caleb Anthony Woods
Timothy Laurance Rozynski

For Bail Consent
Jyden John Kirkpatrick

For Trial
Nigel Robert McLaughlin

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Norman Edward Ohl

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Garry Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Marti Zucco
v

Tasmanian Electoral Commission and James William Walter Fenwick McDonald

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd
v
Eagling-Waters & Anor

Eagling-Waters
v
Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce 
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Gregory John Winch

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shaun Keverall Kaye

For Trial
Stanley Martin Cash

4.00pm For Application
Justin Joseph Ewell

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Variation
Samantha Jane Whish-Wilson

In Court
For mention via video link

Alison Maria Dick

For mention
Michael Andrew Dolbey

For Trial (Part-heard)
Adrian Wayne Smillie

4.00pm
In Court
For mention
Luke Gregory Marshall
Scott Michael Redman

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 17 February 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 27
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 27
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law lists for Monday, 17 February 2014, detail various criminal and civil proceedings scheduled for the day. Notably, several cases are listed for mention, bail, trial, and sentencing, reflecting the court's active caseload. The hearings cover a range of issues, from bail variations to part-heard trials, highlighting the court's role in both preliminary and substantive judicial processes.

Among the legal issues to be addressed are bail variations for defendants in criminal cases, the continuation of trials already in progress, and the sentencing of individuals found guilty. These matters require the court to consider various factors, including the nature of the offence, the circumstances of the case, and the individual circumstances of the defendant. The court must also address procedural issues in civil hearings, such as the validity of electoral commission actions and disputes between businesses.

The Supreme Court's reasoning and outcome in these cases will likely hinge on the specific facts presented in each matter. For instance, bail variations may depend on whether new evidence or changed circumstances warrant a reconsideration of the initial bail conditions. Trials will require careful evaluation of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. Sentencing decisions will be influenced by the severity of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The outcomes will depend on the court's interpretation of the law and its application to the specific facts of each case.

In the civil hearings, the court will assess the merits of the arguments put forward by the Tasmanian Electoral Commission and James William Walter Fenwick McDonald, as well as the business dispute between Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd and Eagling-Waters. The court's decisions in these matters will be crucial in resolving the legal disputes and ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the relevant laws and legal principles.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.