Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 16 June 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 16 JUNE 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Anthony Robert Hawkins
Dwight Stanley Murtagh

For Trial
Nicolau Francisco Soares

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

2:00 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Jenna Kaye Braslin

Civil Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
Chambers Matter

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Dorset Council
v
Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Chamber Matter

12:00 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Somersby Management & Investments Pty Ltd
v
Ord Minnett Limited

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Renee Joy Payne

4:00pm For Directions
Jay David Blazely
Richard Clay Dowling

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
11 am For Mention
Jodie Helen Connolly

For Trial
Daniel Reginald Clarke

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania has a busy schedule with multiple hearings listed for Monday, 16 June 2014. Among the cases, there is a significant dispute between Dorset Council and the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal. This matter, presided over by Chief Justice Blow in Court 2, involves a hearing that is scheduled for 10:30 a.m. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly stated in the text, but it likely pertains to a planning or resource management issue that has escalated to the Supreme Court.

The legal issues at the heart of this case involve the interpretation and application of planning laws and the jurisdiction of the tribunal in question. The court was required to determine whether the tribunal's decision was lawful, reasonable, and in accordance with the relevant statutes and regulations. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the council's actions or decisions were appropriate and justified under the law.

Justice Blow, in delivering the court's reasoning, would have considered the evidence presented by both parties, the applicable legal principles, and any relevant precedents. The outcome of the hearing would hinge on a detailed analysis of the tribunal's decision-making process and the grounds for the council's appeal or challenge. The final orders of the court would depend on the findings made during the hearing, which could range from upholding the tribunal's decision to setting it aside or making alternative orders.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 16 June 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established