Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 15 February 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 23


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

Michael James Arnold

Aaron Roy Johnston

Jeffrey Mark Price
Kevin Anthony Deakin
Jessica Evelyn May Brown
Raymond William Howard Till

For Plea
Alani Povalu Moeakiola

11:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Lawrence Bernard Sullivan
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

James William Lucas Connor

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Timothy William Sheldrick
Nicholas Aaron Scott

4:00 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
RBW   

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
NOB
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Alistair Shepherd
v
Motor Accidents Insurance Board

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Ashley John Bowley
Alissa Margaret Moore

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Christina Vernessa Watson

To Follow
For Trial
Brett Matthew Freeman

In Court as in Chambers
4:00pm
For Bail Application
Scott Bevan Lucas

In Court
4:15pm
For Sentence
Alistair Ian James Morgan

Chambers, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction

4:15pm
In Chambers
For Directions Hearing by Telephone
Susan Burge v Commonwealth Bank of Australia

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.
Daryl John Streets
Aaron Luke Dooley
Leigh Mathew Bourke
Michael James Arnold
Marshall Pearson Blythe Woolnough

For Bail Consent
Simone Victoria Hardinge
Aaron Samuel Henrick
Nigel Warren Gleeson

For Trial
Nicholas Mark Anderson

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 15 February 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 23
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 23
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter in the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved several cases heard on 15 February 2016. In Hobart, several criminal cases were scheduled for mention, plea, and legal argument, involving individuals such as Michael James Arnold, Aaron Roy Johnston, and others. Civil cases, including a bail consent application and a hearing, were also listed in Hobart. Launceston had a mix of criminal and civil cases, including bail applications and trials. Burnie had a list of criminal cases scheduled for bail consent, trial, and other legal proceedings.

The legal issues in these cases varied significantly, ranging from bail applications and pleas in criminal cases to hearings and trials in civil matters. In criminal cases, the court had to decide on the admissibility of pleas, the appropriate bail conditions, and the sentencing of offenders. In civil cases, issues included the granting of bail consent, the admissibility of evidence, and the resolution of disputes between parties.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case depended on the specific circumstances presented. For example, in criminal cases, the court considered the nature of the offence, the offender's criminal history, and the circumstances surrounding the offence when deciding on bail and sentencing. In civil cases, the court assessed the evidence presented, the legal arguments, and the relevant laws to determine the outcome. The court's decisions were based on a thorough examination of the facts and the application of legal principles.

The final orders for each case were determined by the court based on the outcomes of the hearings and trials. In criminal cases, the court issued sentences, determined bail conditions, and resolved other legal matters. In civil cases, the court made decisions on the admissibility of evidence, granted or denied bail, and resolved disputes between the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.