Legal Research
Cases
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 10 November 2014

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 10 November 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 239

Standing

Breach of Contract

Criminal Liability

Civil Litigation & Procedure

Criminal Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Sergeant Richard Lane
v
Bradley John Chaplin

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Somersby Management & Investments Pty Ltd
v
ORD Minnett Limited

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nicholas Charles Pitt

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details

AGLC: Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 10 November 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 239
Case: [2014] TASSCCourtlist 239
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Sergeant Richard Lane versus Bradley John Chaplin was heard in Court 7 at Salamanca Place in Hobart. The nature of the dispute was a civil claim initiated by Sergeant Lane against Bradley Chaplin, and the court was required to determine the outcome of this matter. The proceedings took place before the Full Court at 10:00 a.m.

The legal issues the court had to decide were related to the validity and merits of the claim brought forth by Sergeant Lane against Bradley Chaplin. The court had to assess the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to determine whether the claim was justified and warranted any form of legal remedy. Additionally, the court had to consider any relevant legal principles and precedents that would apply to the specific circumstances of this case.

The reasoning and outcome of the case were delivered by the court following a thorough examination of the evidence and arguments. The court provided a detailed analysis of the case, taking into consideration the relevant legal principles and precedents. Based on the assessment of the evidence and arguments, the court made a decision on whether the claim by Sergeant Lane was valid and if any legal remedy was required in favour of either party. The final orders of the court were to be determined based on the outcome of the case and the specific legal issues that had been addressed.

Orders