Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 8 November 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 234


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 8 NOVEMBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Damien Chatwin
v
Jessica Godfrey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston

BJM
Jason Robert Burns

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Discovery
Somers
v
Earl

LAUNCESTON
Before Justice Estcourt by video-link from Court 8, Supreme Court, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15pm For Sentence
BJM
Jason Robert Burns

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 8 November 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 234
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 234
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 8 November 2013, the Supreme Court of Tasmania convened with several cases listed for judgment and sentencing. Among these was the civil matter of Damien Chatwin versus Jessica Godfrey, presided over by Justice Porter in Court 7. This case involved a dispute between the two parties, the specifics of which were not detailed in the provided text.

The legal issues before Justice Porter likely pertained to the interpretation of the facts and evidence presented, determining liability, and the appropriate remedy or compensation, if any. The court was required to evaluate the credibility of the evidence and apply relevant legal principles to arrive at a judgment. The outcome would depend on how the court viewed the evidence and the arguments presented by both parties.

The court's reasoning and outcome, however, were not provided in the text. Justice Porter would have delivered a judgment that detailed the court's analysis of the evidence, the application of law to the facts, and the final decision. This judgment would set out the legal basis for the court's conclusion and the reasons for any remedy or relief awarded. The final orders would reflect the court's decision on the dispute between Damien Chatwin and Jessica Godfrey.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.