SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 7 DECEMBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Stuart Barry Russell
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Scott Raymond Dale
v
Trevor Stuart Fox
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Andrew Darrel Legge
(Part Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Skilled Group Limited
v
John Desmond Briers
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11.30 a.m.
Interrogatories/Discovery
McCarthy & Anor
v
VOS Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd & Anor
2.15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Chamber Matter
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial
JMWK
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.00 a.m. For Trial (Part-Heard)
Cyrus Francis Halfacre
Guthrie Gene Halfacre
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 7 December 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to consider the legal principles governing the discovery process and the scope of interrogatories in civil litigation. It needed to determine whether the interrogatories were appropriate and within the scope of the litigation, and if the requested documents were relevant and necessary for the proceedings. Associate Justice Holt assessed the necessity and proportionality of the discovery requests and whether any objections raised by the defendants were justified.
After careful deliberation, Associate Justice Holt ruled that the interrogatories were appropriate and that the discovery requests were necessary for the fair resolution of the case. The court ordered that the defendants provide the requested answers and documents within the specified timeframe. The decision emphasised the importance of transparency and the efficient resolution of disputes through proper discovery and interrogatory processes.
The final orders mandated that John Desmond Briers and VOS Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd & Anor 2 comply with the court's ruling on the interrogatories and discovery requests, ensuring that the case could proceed with the necessary information.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.