SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 5 OCTOBER 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Voir Dire
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
2.15 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
John Anthony George
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
LAP
For Trial
Anton Christofer Colev
(Part Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
AJL
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Issa Sebleh Dumbuya
Meshack Hamzie Kamara
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 5 October 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 193
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 193
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to address several legal issues, including the admissibility of evidence in the voir dire of Stephen Roy Standage and the preliminary proceedings application by John Anthony George. In Launceston, the court needed to decide on the progress and outcomes of the ongoing trials involving Issa Sebleh Dumbuya and Meshack Hamzie Kamara, as well as the partially heard trial of Anton Christofer Colev. Each case presented unique legal challenges that necessitated careful consideration by the presiding justices.
The court's reasoning and decisions were guided by the specifics of each case. For instance, the voir dire of Stephen Roy Standage likely involved determining the relevance and admissibility of certain testimonies and evidence. The preliminary proceedings application by John Anthony George would have required the court to consider the merits of the application and its implications for the ongoing case. In Launceston, the court's decisions on the trials of Issa Sebleh Dumbuya and Meshack Hamzie Kamara, as well as Anton Christofer Colev, would have involved ruling on various evidentiary and procedural matters pertinent to each case. Justice Evans and Chief Justice Crawford's rulings were likely based on the evidence presented, legal precedents, and the specific circumstances of each matter.
The final orders of the court would have been documented and communicated to the parties involved, outlining the outcomes of the proceedings and any further steps required in each case. These orders would have been integral in guiding the subsequent stages of the legal processes for the defendants.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.