Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 5 October 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 193


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 5 OCTOBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Voir Dire

Stephen Roy Standage

(Part-Heard)

2.15 p.m.

For Preliminary Proceedings Application

John Anthony George

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Mention

LAP

For Trial

Anton Christofer Colev

(Part Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
AJL

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Issa Sebleh Dumbuya
Meshack Hamzie Kamara 

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 5 October 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 193
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 193
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on Friday, 5 October 2012, in Hobart, with Justice Evans presiding over Court 7 at Salamanca Place. Among the cases listed was a voir dire proceeding concerning Stephen Roy Standage, which was partially heard at 10:00 a.m. Later, at 2:15 p.m., a preliminary proceedings application by John Anthony George was scheduled. In Launceston, Court 1 at Cameron Street, presided over by Chief Justice Crawford, handled criminal jurisdiction matters beginning at 10:00 a.m. Notably, the trial of Anton Christofer Colev, partially heard, was listed in Hobart, while Launceston saw the partial hearing of a trial involving Issa Sebleh Dumbuya and Meshack Hamzie Kamara. Burnie had no scheduled list for that day.

The court was required to address several legal issues, including the admissibility of evidence in the voir dire of Stephen Roy Standage and the preliminary proceedings application by John Anthony George. In Launceston, the court needed to decide on the progress and outcomes of the ongoing trials involving Issa Sebleh Dumbuya and Meshack Hamzie Kamara, as well as the partially heard trial of Anton Christofer Colev. Each case presented unique legal challenges that necessitated careful consideration by the presiding justices.

The court's reasoning and decisions were guided by the specifics of each case. For instance, the voir dire of Stephen Roy Standage likely involved determining the relevance and admissibility of certain testimonies and evidence. The preliminary proceedings application by John Anthony George would have required the court to consider the merits of the application and its implications for the ongoing case. In Launceston, the court's decisions on the trials of Issa Sebleh Dumbuya and Meshack Hamzie Kamara, as well as Anton Christofer Colev, would have involved ruling on various evidentiary and procedural matters pertinent to each case. Justice Evans and Chief Justice Crawford's rulings were likely based on the evidence presented, legal precedents, and the specific circumstances of each matter.

The final orders of the court would have been documented and communicated to the parties involved, outlining the outcomes of the proceedings and any further steps required in each case. These orders would have been integral in guiding the subsequent stages of the legal processes for the defendants.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.