SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2013
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Ronald Krulow and Sarah Krulow
v
Glamorgan Spring Bay Council
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael Neil Shea
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
9:30 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Mention via video-link
Timothy Laurance Rozynski
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Daniel Wheatley
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
David Kronenberg and Robyn Kronenberg
v
Stephen Bridge and Stuart Tanner
For Judgment
Pamela Freeman
v
Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
In the Matter of the Legal Profession Act 2007 and in the Matter of an Application by Joanne Frances Matthews
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 4 October 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 201
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 201
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court likely encompass the interpretation and application of local council bylaws, planning regulations, and possibly statutory provisions governing local government operations. The Krulows may be challenging a decision made by the Glamorgan Spring Bay Council, which could involve disputes over land use, development permissions, or other municipal matters. The court will need to determine whether the council's actions were lawful, procedurally correct, and in compliance with relevant statutory and regulatory frameworks.
The reasoning of the court and the outcome of the case will depend on a detailed examination of the evidence presented, the applicable laws, and any relevant precedents. The Full Court will assess the merits of the Krulows' claims, evaluating whether the council's decision was justified and whether any procedural errors occurred. The court's judgment will provide clarity on the legal standards governing council decisions and the rights of individuals affected by such decisions. The final orders will reflect the court's determination on whether the council's actions were upheld or if any remedies or corrective actions are required.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.