Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 30 March 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 51


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 30 MARCH 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

9:45 a.m.
Reasons for Judgment

Timothy William Daley
Allison Patricia Shipp
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.  
For Mention
ABB
TLD
TAJC
Patrick Arthur Burling
Kristin Callie Athena Jacobson
Jervis Mitchell Holloway

For Plea
Abubakarr Lamin
Matthew Rosevear

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Philip Burns

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.  
Further Directions Hearing
Anthony Nicola Mastrippolito
Maxwell Morrison

Preliminary Proceedings Application
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
Donna Lee Dennison
Dean Rodney Scott

Facts and Sentence
Christopher James Gerrard

For Plea
Patrick Thomas Court

2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Lynett Ann Bellamy

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. 
In Court as in Chambers
Costs Hearing
Johnstone, McGee & Gandy Pty Ltd
v
Hockey Tasmania Incorporated and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m
Third Party Proceedings
Nicci Frances Hererra
V
Soaked PTY and Anor

Discovery
Grange Resources (Tasmania) Pty Ltd (Formerly known as Goldmere Pty ltd)
V
Minerals Industries Inc and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00pm For Sentence
Gilbert Stanley Cocker

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
For Mention
Casey William Edward Ditcham
James Phillip Wright
Tina Louise Jackson
Loretta Ann Brooks
Brett Douglas Scott
Garry Piercy
Noreen Joyce Brown

For Facts and Sentence
LMK

For Plea
Jacqueline Myree Johnson

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 30 March 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 51
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 51
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard involving Timothy William Daley and Allison Patricia Shipp against the State of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly detailed in the document but was likely related to criminal or civil matters, given the court's jurisdiction. The case was heard before Justice Evans in Hobart, indicating it was of significant importance to warrant a superior court hearing. The legal issues the court was required to decide would have been grounded in the specifics of the case, potentially involving questions of criminal liability, procedural fairness, or statutory interpretation, depending on the nature of the dispute.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the document, which only listed the case for mention and did not provide the reasons for judgment or the final decision. Given the context of a court list, it is likely that the case was either resolved through a plea, required further directions, or was scheduled for a hearing to address specific issues such as bail, sentence, or preliminary proceedings. The absence of detailed outcomes in the document suggests that the substantive legal arguments and findings were not immediately available or were subject to confidentiality.

If the case involved a sentence or a significant legal determination, the final orders would have been documented in subsequent court records or judgments. The document, however, served as a preliminary notification of the case's presence on the court list, indicating the court's schedule and the parties involved. This notification is crucial for legal practitioners to monitor cases of interest and prepare for court appearances or other legal proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.