Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 3 June 2016 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 3 JUNE 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Joseph Andrew Edwards
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.
For Mention
RKF
v
Senior Constable Scott

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
In Court
For Trial

Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and anor
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Leave to administer interrogatories
Joshua Cameron Tyler
v
Todd and Victoria Whatley Trading as TW Roofing.

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston.

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Joseph Andrew Edwards has appealed against his conviction to the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Court of Criminal Appeal. The nature of the dispute involves the conviction and sentence imposed by a lower court. Justice Wood will preside over the appeal, which is scheduled to commence at 10:00 a.m. The legal issues that the Court of Criminal Appeal must address include the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, the correctness of any legal principles applied by the trial court, and whether any errors were made that could have affected the outcome of the trial.

The Court of Criminal Appeal will carefully review the trial proceedings, including the evidence presented, the application of legal principles, and the overall fairness of the trial. The Court will consider whether the conviction was supported by the evidence and whether any procedural errors or misapplications of law occurred that could have influenced the result. The outcome of the appeal will determine whether the conviction stands, whether a new trial is ordered, or whether the sentence is reviewed or altered.

If the Court of Criminal Appeal finds merit in the appeal, it may order a new trial or quash the conviction. Should the appeal be unsuccessful, the original conviction and sentence will be upheld. The final orders will be communicated following the conclusion of the appeal hearing, detailing the Court's decision and any subsequent actions required.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 3 June 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established