Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 28 March 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 28 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
Via video link from Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
For Directions
Jason Noel Browning

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Adam Paul Alexander

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 am
For Trial
Alicia Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-heard)
Desmond John Jarvis

10:00am For Directions via video-link to
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jason Noel Browning

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Brendan Valentine Bagley

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard in the Law Lists for Friday, 28 March 2014. The proceedings took place in various locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The case involved multiple parties and encompassed both criminal and civil matters. Among the cases listed, one notable case was that of Alicia Masters against Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg, which was part-heard in Hobart before Justice Pearce.

The legal issues presented in the case before Justice Pearce involved claims brought by Alicia Masters against Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg. The nature of the claims was not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but it was clear that the proceedings were part-heard, indicating that the case required further evidence or arguments before a final decision could be rendered.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the text, but the inclusion of the case in the Law Lists suggests that it was an ongoing matter that required judicial attention. The hearing aimed to address specific legal issues pertinent to the claims made by Alicia Masters and to potentially move the case towards resolution.

As per the procedural nature of the listings, no final orders were detailed in the provided text, and it is likely that further court sessions would be required to conclude the case. The inclusion of multiple parties and locations in the Law Lists highlights the diversity and complexity of cases handled by the Supreme Court of Tasmania.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 28 March 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established