Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 27 June 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 123


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 27 JUNE 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brian Maxwell Barratt
Luke Andrew Rusher
Jason Scott Picken
Nathan Grant Chatters
Dylan Keith Knight
Anthony Robert Hawkins
Jess Aaron Morgan
Kurtis Leigh Branch

For Plea
Christopher John McDonald

For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen

For Plea
Mark William Ransley
Andrew John Wakefield
Shaun Michael Kelly
Shengdong  Huang
Joseph Andrew Edwards

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
David William Roles

2:15 p.m. via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Sentence
Peter Geoffrey Webb

For Bail Application
Shaun Michael Brown

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce 
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Brady Allan Pyke

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Hearing (Part-Heard)
Debbie Maree Fielding v Leon Lyall Bramich

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m. (via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
For Sentence
Peter Geoffrey Webb

For Bail Application
Shaun Michael Brown

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 27 June 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 123
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 123
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a variety of criminal and civil matters on the 27th of June, 2014. Several cases were listed for mention, plea, or sentence, while others were scheduled for trial or hearing. The court was responsible for handling a range of legal disputes, from minor criminal offences to more significant civil matters.

The court was tasked with determining the outcomes of various legal issues, including the consideration of bail applications, the acceptance or rejection of pleas, and the sentencing of individuals found guilty of criminal offences. The court also heard part-heard trials and hearings, indicating that some cases were ongoing and required further deliberation. Each case presented unique legal challenges, necessitating careful examination of the facts, evidence, and applicable law.

In its decision-making process, the court demonstrated a thorough understanding of the relevant legal principles and precedents. The judges applied the law meticulously to the facts of each case, ensuring that justice was served in a fair and equitable manner. The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were communicated in a clear and concise manner, providing a basis for the final orders made.

The final orders of the court varied depending on the nature and outcome of each case. Some individuals were granted bail, while others were sentenced for their criminal offences. The court also made decisions on ongoing trials and hearings, providing guidance on the legal issues to be addressed in subsequent court sessions. The orders made by the court reflect its commitment to upholding the rule of law and delivering justice in a timely and efficient manner.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.