SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 27 JUNE 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brian Maxwell Barratt
Luke Andrew Rusher
Jason Scott Picken
Nathan Grant Chatters
Dylan Keith Knight
Anthony Robert Hawkins
Jess Aaron Morgan
Kurtis Leigh Branch
For Plea
Christopher John McDonald
For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen
For Plea
Mark William Ransley
Andrew John Wakefield
Shaun Michael Kelly
Shengdong Huang
Joseph Andrew Edwards
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
David William Roles
2:15 p.m. via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Sentence
Peter Geoffrey Webb
For Bail Application
Shaun Michael Brown
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Brady Allan Pyke
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Hearing (Part-Heard)
Debbie Maree Fielding v Leon Lyall Bramich
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m. (via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
For Sentence
Peter Geoffrey Webb
For Bail Application
Shaun Michael Brown
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 27 June 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 123
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 123
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining the outcomes of various legal issues, including the consideration of bail applications, the acceptance or rejection of pleas, and the sentencing of individuals found guilty of criminal offences. The court also heard part-heard trials and hearings, indicating that some cases were ongoing and required further deliberation. Each case presented unique legal challenges, necessitating careful examination of the facts, evidence, and applicable law.
In its decision-making process, the court demonstrated a thorough understanding of the relevant legal principles and precedents. The judges applied the law meticulously to the facts of each case, ensuring that justice was served in a fair and equitable manner. The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were communicated in a clear and concise manner, providing a basis for the final orders made.
The final orders of the court varied depending on the nature and outcome of each case. Some individuals were granted bail, while others were sentenced for their criminal offences. The court also made decisions on ongoing trials and hearings, providing guidance on the legal issues to be addressed in subsequent court sessions. The orders made by the court reflect its commitment to upholding the rule of law and delivering justice in a timely and efficient manner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.