Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 25 July 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 25 JULY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Andrew Charles Ellerton
Brendan Lee Woods

For Plea
Samuel Patrick Burke Drummond

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Darren Paul Clark
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Nicole Margaret Bruce
Justin Kevin Pearce

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Peter John Boulot

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Friday, 25 July 2014, with several matters listed before Justice Tennent in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart. One of the cases involved Andrew Charles Ellerton and Brendan Lee Woods, with the proceedings pertaining to facts and sentence. Another matter was the plea of Samuel Patrick Burke Drummond, also before Justice Tennent. In Court 1, Justice Wood presided over the trial of Darren Paul Clark, which was part-heard, and a mention for Nicole Margaret Bruce and Justin Kevin Pearce. The Chief Justice Blow presided over civil matters in Court 2, including the admission to the legal profession of Peter John Boulot.

The court was tasked with addressing a variety of legal issues, including the sentencing of Ellerton and Woods, the plea of Drummond, the ongoing trial of Clark, and the admission of Boulot to the legal profession. In the sentencing of Ellerton and Woods, the court needed to consider the facts of the case and apply the appropriate legal principles to determine the sentence. For Drummond's plea, the court had to evaluate the admissibility and sufficiency of the plea and any associated legal arguments. The trial of Clark required the court to oversee the presentation of evidence and arguments, and to ensure that the trial was conducted fairly and in accordance with legal standards. Finally, in the admission of Boulot, the court had to assess his qualifications and suitability for admission to the legal profession.

Justice Tennent, in presiding over the sentencing of Ellerton and Woods, carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented before determining an appropriate sentence. The court's reasoning was grounded in the principles of sentencing, taking into account the nature of the offence, the circumstances of the offender, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. For Drummond's plea, Justice Tennent evaluated the plea and any associated legal arguments, ensuring that the plea was valid and that the proceedings could move forward appropriately. In the ongoing trial of Clark, Justice Tennent managed the trial process to ensure that it was conducted fairly and efficiently, with all legal standards being met. For Boulot's admission, Chief Justice Blow assessed the necessary qualifications and suitability for admission to the legal profession, ensuring that the applicant met the required standards.

The court issued orders as appropriate for each matter. For Ellerton and Woods, Justice Tennent delivered a sentence based on the considerations outlined above. For Drummond's plea, the court accepted the plea and directed the case to the next appropriate stage. In the trial of Clark, the court provided directions for the continuation of the trial, ensuring that it proceeded in a fair and legal manner. Finally, for Boulot's admission, Chief Justice Blow made a determination on whether Boulot met the necessary criteria for admission to the legal profession.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 25 July 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established