Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 24 July 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 24 JULY 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before THE FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via Video-Link to
Court 2, Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Roger Wayne Calvert
v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors (a Firm)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Patrick Lawrence Smith

For Bail Consent
Marcus Paul Wilson

For Trial
Dawn Ruth Flower
Robin Thomas Flower
(Part-Heard)

In Court as in Chambers
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Variation
Shannon Myree Arnold

For Bail Application
KJL

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Leah Lesley Cannon

(Part-Heard)

In Court as in Chambers

4:00 p.m.

For Bail Application

Manjing Moses Mading

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Craig Andrew O’Neill
v
Natasha Rhodes

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Linda Lee Jones

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before THE FULL COURT
9:30am For Judgment via Video-Link
From Court 1, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Roger Wayne Calvert
v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors (a Firm)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.45am for Trial
Mark Raymond Roland

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard involving Roger Wayne Calvert as the plaintiff against Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors (a firm) as the defendants. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly detailed in the court list but typically involves issues related to professional negligence or legal services. The hearing was scheduled before the Full Court in Hobart and was to be conducted via video-link to Launceston. This suggests a significant or complex matter requiring the attention of multiple judges.

The legal issues before the court would likely revolve around whether the defendants, who are legal practitioners, breached their professional duties owed to the plaintiff. This could include allegations of negligence, breach of contract, or misconduct in their handling of the plaintiff’s case. The court was tasked with determining if the defendants' actions or omissions fell below the standard expected of legal professionals and if such actions caused harm or loss to the plaintiff.

The court’s reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the court list, indicating that the case may be ongoing or the results were not immediately available. However, the use of the Full Court suggests that the matter had enough importance or complexity to warrant a higher level of scrutiny and consideration by multiple judges. The Full Court’s decision would have involved a thorough review of the evidence, applicable laws, and legal precedents to arrive at a just conclusion.

No final orders were stated in the court list, implying that the case was still pending a decision or that the outcomes would be communicated at a later stage. The plaintiff would have to await the court’s judgment to understand the implications of the decision on their case.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 24 July 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established