Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 23 March 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 23 MARCH 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10.00 a.m.
For Application
CGE

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Clinton Mark Walker

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Trial
10:00 a.m.
TCT
(Part Heard)

For Sentence
Adrian Alwyn Pickett

For Mention
Kerry Bruce Roberts

Further Directions Hearing
Matthew John Townsend
Anna-Lyce Maree Olding
Anthony Wayne Emery
Samuel John Devine
Brodie James Kirkpatrick

Preliminary Proceedings Application
Daniel John Baker
Aaron James Crosswell
Jervis Mitchell Holloway
Scott Brian Enslow
Manjing Moses Mading

For Plea
Ashley Dean Brown
Nigel Phillip Barratt
Scott Andrew Ian Harvey

Civil Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone conference
Bellenjuc Pty Ltd
v
Kentish Council

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Decision
Geoffrey Douglas Summers
v
The National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited

LAUNCESTON
No List for Launceston.

BURNIE
No List for Burnie.

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case in the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Friday, 23 March 2012 involved several criminal and civil proceedings. Among the cases listed were bail applications, trials, sentencing, and civil hearings. Notably, the Court of Criminal Appeal was set to hear an application from Clinton Mark Walker, while Justice Wood presided over a bail application in another case. Additionally, several defendants were scheduled for trial or sentencing, including Adrian Alwyn Pickett and Ashley Dean Brown. Civil matters were also on the agenda, with a directions hearing scheduled by telephone conference for the case Bellenjuc Pty Ltd v Kentish Council, presided over by Justice TENNENT.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal and civil matters. In the criminal cases, the primary issues included the assessment of bail applications, determination of appropriate sentences, and the resolution of preliminary proceedings. For the bail applications, the court needed to consider whether the applicants met the criteria for bail, balancing the risk of flight against the severity of the alleged crimes. Sentencing hearings required the court to impose penalties that were proportionate to the severity of the crimes committed. The civil case involved directions on the management and progression of the litigation between Bellenjuc Pty Ltd and Kentish Council, focusing on procedural and jurisdictional matters.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were detailed in the proceedings. In the bail application for Clinton Mark Walker, Justice Evans evaluated the risk factors and circumstances surrounding the alleged crime to determine if bail was warranted. For the sentencing of Adrian Alwyn Pickett, the court considered the aggravating and mitigating factors, ultimately deciding on a sentence that reflected the gravity of the offence. The civil directions hearing for Bellenjuc Pty Ltd v Kentish Council saw Justice TENNENT providing guidance on the procedural steps and timelines for the case, ensuring both parties were aware of their obligations. Each case was handled with a focus on the specific legal principles applicable to the jurisdiction and the unique facts presented.

The final orders from the court were not explicitly detailed in the document, but typically, they would include the granting or denial of bail, the imposition of sentences, and procedural directives for ongoing cases. The outcomes would have been communicated to the parties involved, setting the stage for subsequent stages of the legal process.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 23 March 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established