SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 21 NOVEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Leah Lesley Cannon
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ricky John Izard
Rodney McCrae
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Julie Louise Rowbottom
(Part-Heard)
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods
For Disputed Facts
Vance Roy Lobban
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11:00 a.m.
Discovery
Bluett and Ors
v
Fletcher
2:15 p.m.
Injuction
Norris
v
Pedder and Moore
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Joshua Atkinson
Shaun Keverall Kaye
A Witness
Mitchell William Bullen
Anna Michelle Levett
Christina Vernessa Watson
For Directions
Brett Matthew Freeman
Samuel Troy Leslie
For Bail Application
Luke James Reader
Tiffany Louise Shaw
For Plea
Michael Ashley Boxer
For Trial (Part Heard)
Alissa Margaret Moore
Mark Andrew Jenkins
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Adrian John Hall
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jason Noel Rowe
(Part-Heard)
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 21 November 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 250
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from criminal charges to civil disputes, requiring the court to address matters such as the admissibility of evidence, the application of legal precedents, and the interpretation of contractual obligations. In the criminal cases, the court had to consider whether the prosecution had established its case beyond reasonable doubt. In the civil case, the court needed to determine the validity of the claims and counterclaims made by the parties involved.
The court's reasoning and outcome varied with each case. In criminal cases, the court evaluated the evidence presented and the arguments made by both the prosecution and defence. It determined whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty based on the legal standards. For the civil case, the court assessed the merits of the arguments made by the parties, focusing on whether the plaintiff's claims were substantiated by the evidence and if the defendant's counterclaims were valid. The court issued rulings accordingly, ensuring that the legal processes were followed and that justice was served based on the facts and the law.
The final orders included convictions, acquittals, and sentencing in criminal cases, as well as judgments and orders in the civil dispute. Each decision was made after careful consideration of the evidence and legal principles applicable to the specific circumstances of the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.