Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 November 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
JRJ
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.

For Sentence

Anton Christofer Colev

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Bolong Holdings Pty Ltd
v
Concorde Investments Pty Ltd & Bruce Malcolm Mansfield Hallock

Bolong Holdings Pty Ltd
v
Bruce Malcolm Mansfield Hallock
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Judgment

The Queen
v

Andrew Holman and Davies Brothers Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am
For Trial (Part Heard)
KJY

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am
For Mention
Brent John Bingley

For Sentence
Leigh David Newton
Jarret Anthony McCall

For Trial (Part Heard)
James Phillip Wright

1.45pm
For Sentence via Video-Link to Supreme Court, Burnie
Dwayne John Gardner

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had a busy schedule on 2 November 2012 with various hearings and trials listed. In the criminal jurisdiction, there were trials and sentencing hearings for individuals such as JRJ and Anton Christofer Cole. In the civil jurisdiction, there was a hearing for Bolong Holdings Pty Ltd against Concorde Investments Pty Ltd and Bruce Malcolm Mansfield Hallock, and a judgment for The Queen against Andrew Holman and Davies Brothers Pty Ltd. The court also had miscellaneous civil business in Launceston, including trials and sentencing hearings for individuals such as Brent John Bingley and Leigh David Newton.

The legal issues in the civil case of Bolong Holdings Pty Ltd v Concorde Investments Pty Ltd and Bruce Malcolm Mansfield Hallock involved a dispute between the parties regarding a contract or transaction, and the court had to decide on the validity and enforceability of the agreement. The court also had to consider any breaches of contract or other legal claims made by the parties. In the criminal case of The Queen v Andrew Holman and Davies Brothers Pty Ltd, the court had to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused individuals and, if found guilty, to impose an appropriate sentence.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not provided in the text. However, it is common for courts to provide detailed written judgments or reasons for their decisions, which can be accessed through legal databases or court websites. The final orders of the court would depend on the specific findings and conclusions reached in each case. It is important for lawyers to review the written judgments and orders to understand the legal principles and outcomes of each case.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 November 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established