Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 15 March 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 38


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 15 MARCH 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Application
Eugene William Smith

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Peter David Leaman

Nathan Grant Chatters

For Trial

William Eric Yabsley 

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Nicholas Barry Wordsworth

For Further Directions Hearing
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
Leigh Reginald Dobson
Kerry Leigh Large
Emily Michelle Afa

For First Directions Hearing
Paul Brian Edward Connolly

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
David John McKinnon

For Plea
Darren Scott Freeman
Corey Luke Cordwell
Michael Edward Deering
Daniel Charles Oswin
Allan Albert Fazackerley
Darryl John Catlin
Mairi Margaret Carmel Barclay
David Raymond Braslin
Tristan Michael Daly
Timothy Geoffrey Briers
Daniel Benjamin Bradshaw
Bevan William Parkinson
Garry Matthews
Leesa Nicole Tovey

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Associated Forest Holding Pty Ltd and Ors
v
Gordian Runoff Limited

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9.15 a.m.

Via video link to Burnie

Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.00 a.m.

For Discovery

Australia Personnel Global Pty Limited

v

Waller & Anor

2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
Raspin
v
The Motor Accidents Insurance Board

4.15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Britton & Ors
v
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood 
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
SJPM

10.00am For Mention
Glen Bamford

12.00pm For Plea
Leon Robert Lucas

2.15pm For Directions
William John Christopher McFardzean Foran

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 15 March 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 38
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 38
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 15 March 2013, contain a variety of cases across both criminal and civil jurisdictions. Notable cases include a bail application for Eugene William Smith and a part-heard trial for William Eric Yabsley. Additionally, there are several preliminary proceedings and first directions hearings scheduled. The court also has ongoing cases, such as the part-heard trial of Associated Forest Holding Pty Ltd and others versus Gordian Runoff Limited. In civil matters, a discovery application by Australia Personnel Global Pty Limited against Waller and another is listed, as well as a hearing for Raspin versus The Motor Accidents Insurance Board.

The court faced several legal issues, including the assessment of bail applications, directions for preliminary proceedings, and the progression of ongoing trials. For instance, in the bail application for Eugene William Smith, the court had to consider the factors relevant to granting or refusing bail. Similarly, in the civil case of Australia Personnel Global Pty Limited versus Waller, the court had to determine the scope and admissibility of the discovery application. Furthermore, the ongoing trials required the court to manage the evidence presented and the procedural steps necessary for the fair and efficient resolution of the cases.

Justice Evans, Justice Blow, and Justice Tennant presided over the respective hearings, ensuring that the legal processes were followed and the rights of the parties were protected. The court's decisions on bail applications, directions hearings, and the progression of trials were based on the evidence and arguments presented by the parties. The court's reasoning was rooted in established legal principles and statutes, aiming to provide just outcomes in each case.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the text, but it is expected that the court would provide detailed orders in its respective judgments and decisions for each case. These orders would address the specific issues raised in the applications, hearings, and trials, ensuring that the legal processes were completed appropriately.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.