Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 15 August 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 15 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Matthew Kent Goodman

For Plea
Ali Sulieman

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Dino Di Benedetto
v
Marcus Grant Ralph and Shaun Buissink

11:00 a.m.
Andrew Stuart Everett
v
State of Tasmania

02:15 p.m.
Dianne Mary Honey
v
Robert Vlaskovac

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
McCarthy and Anor
v
VOS Construction Pty Ltd and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Charles Pitt

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Dino Di Benedetto and Marcus Grant Ralph and Shaun Buissink was scheduled for hearing before Chief Justice Blow. The nature of the dispute is a civil matter, with Dino Di Benedetto acting as the plaintiff and Marcus Grant Ralph and Shaun Buissink as defendants. The hearing was part of the civil jurisdiction and was set for 10:00 a.m. The specific legal issues to be addressed in this case revolve around the claims and defenses presented by the plaintiff and the defendants, respectively. The court was required to determine the validity of the plaintiff's claims and the adequacy of the defendants' responses.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided text, but the case was scheduled for hearing, indicating that the legal arguments and evidence would be presented and considered. The outcome would depend on the findings of fact and the application of relevant legal principles to those facts. The decision of the court would likely address the merits of the claims and any counterclaims or defenses, and could result in a judgment in favor of one party or the other, or possibly a settlement or further proceedings.

No further details on the specific legal issues, reasoning, or outcome were provided in the text. The hearing was set for 10:00 a.m. before Chief Justice Blow, and the case was part of the civil jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The final orders of the court would be determined after the hearing and would be subject to any appeals or further legal proceedings.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 15 August 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established