SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 13 NOVEMBER 2015
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Mark William Eather
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Brian Kevin Pretty
Tammy Jean Dance
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Lisa Maree Hogan
Chase Stephen Lane Hall
For Sentence
Terrence Ashley McGill
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Scott William Cartwright
Garry James Brodie
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Plea
Rachael Vanessa Bradford
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Judgment by video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Gunns Limited (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liquidation)
v
State of Tasmania
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
Myrna Graham
v
Patrick Graham
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am For Judgment via Video Link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Gunns Limited (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liquidation) v State of Tasmania
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 13 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 248
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 248
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining the scope of the State's liability in relation to the debts and obligations of Gunns Limited. This included examining whether the State could be held liable for certain actions or inactions of the company, particularly in light of the company's status in liquidation. The court had to decide if there were any grounds upon which the State could be held accountable for the debts of Gunns Limited and the implications of the liquidation on such liabilities.
Associate Justice Holt delivered the judgment after considering the arguments and evidence presented. The court ruled in favour of Gunns Limited, determining that the State of Tasmania was not liable for the debts and obligations of the company. The reasoning provided by the court involved a detailed analysis of the statutory framework governing the company's liquidation and the responsibilities of the State in such scenarios. The judgment clarified the boundaries of the State's liability and provided a definitive resolution to the dispute.
The final orders of the court were that the State of Tasmania was not liable for the debts and obligations of Gunns Limited (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liquidation). The court's decision was based on a comprehensive review of the relevant legislation and the facts of the case, ensuring a clear and legally sound conclusion.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.