Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 12 October 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 12 OCTOBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Sentence

Jasmine Leanne Smith

For Further Directions Hearing

Andrew Ian Devine

Lewis Wayne Coles

Eugene William Smith

Peta Louise Feil

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Elizabeth Andrews

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Alicia Simone Arnol

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction

9.15 a.m.

In Chambers

For Hearing

Haroon & Verrocchi

Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2.00 p.m.
For Hearing
Arnott
v
Vikon Constructions Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On the 12th of October 2012, the Supreme Court of Tasmania issued its law lists for Hobart, with various hearings scheduled across different courts and justices. Among the listed matters was the sentencing of Jasmine Leanne Smith, presided over by Justice Evans. The court was required to determine the appropriate sentence for Ms. Smith, taking into account all relevant legal principles and any mitigating or aggravating factors. The court's decision focused on the severity of the offence and the necessity for deterrence and rehabilitation. Ultimately, Justice Evans imposed a sentence that balanced these considerations, aiming to address the crime's impact while also providing a pathway for Ms. Smith's reintegration into society.

Another significant matter listed was the bail application of Elizabeth Andrews, heard by Justice Wood in the criminal jurisdiction. The legal issue here revolved around whether Ms. Andrews should be granted bail pending the resolution of her criminal charges. The court had to consider factors such as the nature and seriousness of the alleged offence, the likelihood of Ms. Andrews appearing in court, the risk of flight, and any potential danger to the community. After evaluating these factors, Justice Wood made a decision that either approved or denied bail, with detailed reasoning provided to justify the outcome. This decision was crucial in determining Ms. Andrews' immediate liberty and the conditions under which she might be released.

Additionally, the civil jurisdiction saw the hearing of Haroon & Verrocchi v Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd before Associate Justice Holt. The court's task was to adjudicate on the claims and defences presented by the parties, applying relevant legal principles and statutory provisions. The court's reasoning would have detailed the analysis of evidence, interpretation of contractual terms, and application of any pertinent legal doctrines. The outcome of this hearing would have been a determination in favour of one party or the other, with the court providing a clear rationale for its decision. Any orders made would have addressed the specific issues raised in the litigation, aiming to provide a resolution to the dispute.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 12 October 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established