SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 11 SEPTEMBER 2015
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd
(part-heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Alhajie Ismail Kamara
Corey Adam Triffitt
Jonathon Paul Pearce
Michelle Lee Arnott
Craig Steven Cleaver
Adrian Eugene Kelleher
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
For Application to Vary Bail
Kyle Raymond Thomas-Fitzpatrick
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Paul Anthony Rae
For Plea
Keenan Sam Milligan
Sally Anne McGuire
Joshua Leigh Picken
MAW
Lawrence Bernard Sullivan
Daryl Royston Wayne Cook
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous civil business
11:00 a.m.
Chamber matter
LAUNCESTON
COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall
To Follow
In Court as In Chambers
Chambers Application
COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Adrian Connor Bailey
Daniel Mark Delphine
Matthew Peter Bounday
Alexander James Bartels
Aaron Neil Cavallaro
Tye Lawrence Whitmore
To Follow for First Directions Hearing
John George Carnie
To Follow for Bail Consent
Victoria Elizabeth Burton
Stephanie Peta Fleming
William Maxwell Causon
To Follow for Trial (Part-Heard)
Louise Jane Williams
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 11 September 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 195
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 195
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved a range of criminal proceedings, including trials, bail applications, and mentions. The court was required to address the procedural aspects of these cases, including the progression of trials, the appropriateness of bail conditions, and preliminary hearings. The civil matters before Associate Justice Holt involved miscellaneous business, likely encompassing a variety of civil disputes requiring judicial intervention.
The reasoning and outcomes of these cases were not detailed in the provided text. The Supreme Court would have addressed each matter according to its specific legal requirements and the evidence presented. The outcomes would have been communicated to the parties involved and would include decisions on guilt or innocence, bail terms, and the progression of civil disputes. The court’s final orders would be documented in the respective case files.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.