Supreme Court of Tasmania Law List for Wednesday 9 May 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 77

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY 9 MAY 2012

HOBART LIST

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
Joshua Andrew Potts
v
Darren Stephen Ian Frost
(Part heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence 
Damon John Temple

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.  
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Applications
Jamie Penneyston
Aaron Grant

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
Pre Trial Conferences by telephone
The Tesa Group Pty Ltd
V
Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd

Fishpool
V
Incat Tasmania Pty Ltd & Anor

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law List for Wednesday 9 May 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 77
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 77
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Joshua Andrew Potts initiated proceedings against Darren Stephen Ian Frost in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but it appears to involve a part-heard matter. The hearing was scheduled for 2:15 p.m. on Wednesday, 9 May 2012, in Hobart. The legal issues the court was required to decide were not outlined in the text. The reasoning and outcome of the court's decision are also not provided.

The court was required to determine the legal issues arising from the proceedings between Joshua Andrew Potts and Darren Stephen Ian Frost. However, the specific legal issues were not mentioned in the text. The text does not provide details on the court's reasoning and the outcome of the decision.

No final orders are mentioned in the text. The case involves a part-heard matter, indicating that the proceedings were ongoing and further court sessions were likely necessary to reach a conclusion. The outcome of the case and any final orders made by the court remain undisclosed in the provided text.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.