SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 19 APRIL 2012
HOBART - AMENDED LIST
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Mention
Tara Maree Magee
For Trial
Kerry Bruce Roberts
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Trial
Anthony Colin Finnegan
(part-heard)
4:15 pm
For Sentence
TAJC
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Judgment
Richard John Howroyd
v
Terrence David Howroyd
Criminal Jurisdiction
3.00 p.m.
For Sentence
RJE
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 p.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11.30 a.m.
Enter Judgment/Discovery
St Luke’s Medical & Hospital Benefits Association
V
Ahmed Nadeem & Anor
3.15 p.m.
For Strike out Statement of Claim/Interrogatories by video link to Launceston
Omnigas Services Pty Ltd
V
Stewart & Ors
4.15 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference by telephone
Janis Eileen Moore
V
Fiona Nawrocki
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Timothy Hudson
Neville Lindsay Whiting
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 am For Trial (Part-Heard)
AN
2.15 pm For Mention
Simon John Dennison
To Follow For Plea
SEWL
AEC
Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Amended Law Lists for Thursday, 19 April 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 62
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 62
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases span a range of criminal and civil matters, including the outcomes of trials, sentencing, judgments in disputes, and procedural matters such as striking out statements of claim and interrogatories, and pre-trial conferences. The court's role is to adjudicate on the evidence and arguments presented, to apply relevant laws, and to make determinations that resolve the disputes before them. The specific issues in each case would depend on the nature of the allegations or claims, the evidence presented, and the legal arguments advanced by the parties.
The court’s reasoning and outcome for each case will be based on the specific facts and legal principles applicable to each matter. For example, in criminal cases, the court will consider whether the prosecution has proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, while in civil cases, the court will determine liability and, if applicable, the quantum of damages. Justices Tennent, Porter, Wood, and Holt, as well as Chief Justice Crawford, will apply their judicial discretion and legal expertise to ensure that justice is served in each instance. The outcomes will be communicated through judgments, sentences, and other court orders as appropriate.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.