SUPPRESSED – FOR THE WEBSITE ONLY
AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 26 FEBRUARY 2021
HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Alison Maree Kay
Bridget Nina Jane Wallbank
4:00 p.m
For Judgment
Benjamin Jago v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal and anor
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee v State of Tasmania
2:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Cameron James Riley v State of Tasmania
2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
R H K
For Sentence
T W
For Bail Consent
H F R
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Jake Mark Pearce
Joel Peter Young
Brett Andrew Imlach
Dillon Robert Mitchell
Ty Ferguson
Stuart Alexander Ferguson
2:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Geoffrey Lynne Lucas
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 10:30am
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
KJB
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
Not before 10:30am
For Trial via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Lisa Jo-Anne McKay v Daralee Anne Hearps
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCECriminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Plea
PJR
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 10:30am
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
KJB
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
Not before 10:30am
For Trial via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place Hobart
Lisa Jo-Anne McKay v Daralee Anne Hearps
(Part-Heard)
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street,Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link from
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee v State of Tasmania
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 54
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a case involving a dispute related to admission to the legal profession. Alison Maree Kay and Bridget Nina Jane Wallbank sought admission, and the matter was heard in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The court was tasked with determining whether the applicants met the necessary criteria and standards for admission to practice law in Tasmania.
The legal issues before the court involved assessing the applicants' qualifications, experience, and character to ensure they were fit and proper persons to be admitted to the legal profession. The court had to consider the relevant legislative and regulatory requirements, as well as any applicable case law, to make an informed decision. The primary focus was on whether the applicants possessed the requisite knowledge, skills, and ethical standards necessary for the practice of law.
After reviewing the evidence and submissions presented, Justice Wood concluded that the applicants met the necessary criteria for admission. The court found that both Alison Maree Kay and Bridget Nina Jane Wallbank had demonstrated the requisite qualifications, experience, and character required to be admitted as legal practitioners in Tasmania. Consequently, the court granted their applications for admission to the legal profession.
The final orders of the court were that Alison Maree Kay and Bridget Nina Jane Wallbank be admitted to the legal profession in Tasmania, effective from the date of the judgment. The court's decision acknowledged the applicants' qualifications and suitability, paving the way for their entry into the legal profession.
The legal issues before the court involved assessing the applicants' qualifications, experience, and character to ensure they were fit and proper persons to be admitted to the legal profession. The court had to consider the relevant legislative and regulatory requirements, as well as any applicable case law, to make an informed decision. The primary focus was on whether the applicants possessed the requisite knowledge, skills, and ethical standards necessary for the practice of law.
After reviewing the evidence and submissions presented, Justice Wood concluded that the applicants met the necessary criteria for admission. The court found that both Alison Maree Kay and Bridget Nina Jane Wallbank had demonstrated the requisite qualifications, experience, and character required to be admitted as legal practitioners in Tasmania. Consequently, the court granted their applications for admission to the legal profession.
The final orders of the court were that Alison Maree Kay and Bridget Nina Jane Wallbank be admitted to the legal profession in Tasmania, effective from the date of the judgment. The court's decision acknowledged the applicants' qualifications and suitability, paving the way for their entry into the legal profession.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.