| [2020] FWCA 1604 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited
(AG2019/4515)
SUNSTATE AIRLINES PTY LTD (AIRCRAFT ENGINEERS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Airline operations | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 27 MARCH 2020 |
Application for approval of the Sunstate Airlines Pty Ltd (Aircraft Engineers) Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited (the Applicant) applies for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sunstate Airlines Pty Ltd (Aircraft Engineers) Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s. 54 of the Act and will operate from 3 April 2020. The nominal expiry date is 31 December 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507561 PR717793>
- AGLC
- Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited [2020] FWCA 1604
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 1604
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues were whether the agreement adhered to the provisions of the Fair Work Act and if it met the requirements for good faith bargaining. The court had to assess whether the agreement contained the necessary minimum entitlements, if it complied with the procedural fairness requirements, and if it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The court also considered the broader implications for industrial relations and the balance of power between employers and employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that while the agreement was mostly compliant, certain clauses did not meet the statutory requirements. The court noted that the parties had engaged in good faith bargaining, but some provisions, particularly those related to redundancy, did not provide adequate protection for employees. The commission made orders to amend the agreement to ensure it met the legal standards set by the Fair Work Act, thus allowing the agreement to proceed with the necessary modifications.
The final orders of the court required the parties to revise the agreement to include specific provisions on redundancy and to ensure all minimum entitlements were clearly outlined. The amended agreement was then to be resubmitted for approval. The court's decision emphasised the importance of fair and transparent negotiations and the need for compliance with legislative requirements in enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.