[2013] FWCA 5430 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Sunshine Interior Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1813)
SUNSHINE INTERIOR SERVICES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 7 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Sunshine Interior Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sunshine Interior Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Sunshine Interior Services Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from
14 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from approval.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402897 PR539876>
- AGLC
- Sunshine Interior Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5430
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5430
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the arguments presented by both parties and examined the specific terms of the agreement. It found that while the agreement contained some terms that were contentious, the overall balance of the agreement was fair and reasonable. The Commission emphasised the importance of the bargaining process and the need for agreements to reflect the terms and conditions of employment in a manner that was fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both employers and employees. The Commission concluded that, despite some imperfections, the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017, subject to certain modifications to address the concerns raised by the CFMEU. These modifications included changes to specific terms that the Commission found were not fair and reasonable. The approval was granted on the condition that these changes be implemented within a specified timeframe. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements balance the interests of both employers and employees while complying with the statutory requirements for fairness and reasonableness.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.