Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service Summary

[2013] FWCA 798

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service
(AG2013/4339)

SUNSHINE COAST HELICOPTER RESCUE SERVICE ENGINEER'S ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Airline operations
COMMISSIONER BOOTH	BRISBANE, 7 FEBRUARY 2013

Application for approval of the Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service Engineer's Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service Engineer's Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service (SCHR) sought approval of its new Enterprise Agreement, named the Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service Engineer's Enterprise Agreement 2012. The agreement was proposed to replace the existing agreement which was set to expire. The dispute centred on whether the proposed terms and conditions were fair and reasonable in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009.

The key legal issues that the Commission had to resolve included whether the agreement met the "better off overall test," ensuring that employees were not worse off financially, and whether the agreement complied with the "no-disadvantage test." This required that employees under the new agreement were not disadvantaged compared to if they remained under the old agreement. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement adhered to the provisions of the National Employment Standards.

The Commission examined the financial implications for the employees, taking into account the proposed changes to wages, leave entitlements, and other conditions. It assessed whether the proposed agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees overall. The Commission also considered the necessity for the changes, particularly in the context of the financial sustainability of the SCHR. Ultimately, the Commission determined that the agreement met the better off overall test and did not result in any disadvantage to the employees. The proposed changes were found to be reasonable and in line with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.

Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established