Sunol v Collier (No 2)

In *Sunol v Collier (No 2)*, the applicant sought an order for referral to a legal practitioner on the Pro Bono Panel. The applicant was experiencing cognitive difficulties that impaired his ability to present oral argument. The central question before the Court was whether such a referral was in the interests of the administration of justice.

The Court was required to determine whether the applicant's cognitive difficulties constituted a sufficient basis to warrant the appointment of pro bono representation. This involved considering the overarching principle of ensuring justice is administered fairly and accessibly, particularly for litigants facing significant personal challenges that might hinder their capacity to effectively participate in court proceedings.

Meagher JA granted the application, reasoning that the interests of justice demanded that the applicant receive assistance to present his case. The Court recognised that cognitive impairments could create a substantial barrier to a litigant's ability to articulate their arguments, and that providing pro bono assistance was an appropriate mechanism to overcome this barrier and ensure a fair hearing. Consequently, the Court ordered that the applicant be referred to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the Pro Bono Panel for advice and representation in relation to his application for leave to appeal. No order was made as to costs.