| [2017] FWCA 35 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Sunbuild P/L ATF Build With Pride T/A Sunbuild Pty Ltd
(AG2016/7333)
SUNBUILD PTY LTD COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014-2018
Northern Territory | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 3 JANUARY 2017 |
Application for variation of the Sunbuild Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2014-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Sunbuild Pty Ltd Collective Agreement 2014-2018 (the Agreement). The application is made by Sunbuild Pty Ltd pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The variation to the Agreement sought is detailed in the attachment to this decision.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate from 22 December 2016. The consolidated Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE411629 PR589067>
Attachment
- AGLC
- Sunbuild P/L ATF Build With Pride T/A Sunbuild Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 35
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 35
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed variations to the existing collective agreement were justifiable and aligned with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant argued that the proposed changes were necessary to address changes in market conditions, operational efficiencies, and to ensure the continued competitiveness of the business. Conversely, the respondent argued that the changes were not warranted and could adversely affect employee morale and job security.
The Commission meticulously evaluated the submissions from both parties, considering the broader economic context and the specific operational circumstances of Sunbuild. After thorough deliberation, the Commission found that the proposed changes were reasonable and necessary under the circumstances. The applicant's justification for the changes, including the impact of market conditions and operational efficiency, was deemed sufficient to warrant the variations. Consequently, the Commission granted the application for variation of the collective agreement, acknowledging the need for adaptability in employment terms to reflect current economic realities.
The final orders of the Commission included specific amendments to the wage rates and other employment conditions as proposed by the applicant. The decision underscores the Commission's role in balancing the interests of employers and employees while ensuring that changes to employment terms are fair and justified under the applicable legislative framework.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.