Sullivan v Director of Public Prosecutions
Case
•
[2000] HCATrans 424
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sullivan v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] HCATrans 424
[2000] HCATrans 424
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia by Mr Sullivan against a decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions. The dispute arose from a conviction for an offence under the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth).
The primary legal issue before Hayne J was whether the applicant had established a sufficient arguable case of error in the decision of the lower court to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. This involved considering whether the grounds of appeal raised a question of law that was not frivolous or vexatious and had some prospect of success.
Hayne J considered the applicant's submissions regarding the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) and the evidence presented at trial. His Honour concluded that the grounds of appeal did not disclose an arguable case of error that would justify the High Court exercising its jurisdiction to grant special leave.
Special leave to appeal was refused.
The primary legal issue before Hayne J was whether the applicant had established a sufficient arguable case of error in the decision of the lower court to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. This involved considering whether the grounds of appeal raised a question of law that was not frivolous or vexatious and had some prospect of success.
Hayne J considered the applicant's submissions regarding the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) and the evidence presented at trial. His Honour concluded that the grounds of appeal did not disclose an arguable case of error that would justify the High Court exercising its jurisdiction to grant special leave.
Special leave to appeal was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Charge
-
Jurisdiction
-
Appeal
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
McRoberts v The Queen [2018] NTCCA 11
Cases Citing This Decision
2
United Mexican States v Cabal
[2001] HCA 60
McRoberts v The Queen
[2018] NTCCA 11
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1
Malvaso v the Queen
[1989] HCA 58
Malvaso v the Queen
[1989] HCA 58