SULLIVAN & PROSSER
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 3129
•28 October 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
SULLIVAN & PROSSER [2014] FCCA 3129
[2014] FCCA 3129
28 October 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Sullivan & Prosser*, heard before Judge Harman, the dispute concerned parenting arrangements for a child, X, born in 2010. The orders indicate a resolution was reached regarding the child's residence, parental responsibility, and time spent with each parent.
The court was required to determine the living arrangements for X, including who the child would live with and the allocation of parental responsibility. Additionally, the court needed to establish the terms upon which X would spend time with his mother, Ms Prosser, and address the withdrawal and dismissal of all outstanding applications and responses, effectively resolving all matters awaiting hearing.
Judge Harman ordered that X shall live with his father, Mr Sullivan, who was granted sole parental responsibility. X is to spend time with Ms Prosser on terms agreed between the parents. The court also made specific provisions regarding the particulars of these orders, including the consequences of contravention and assistance for compliance, as detailed in an attached Fact Sheet. All prior orders were discharged, and outstanding applications and responses were withdrawn and dismissed. Finally, provisions were made for the return or destruction of exhibits and subpoenaed material upon the expiration of the appeal period, assuming no appeal is lodged.
The court was required to determine the living arrangements for X, including who the child would live with and the allocation of parental responsibility. Additionally, the court needed to establish the terms upon which X would spend time with his mother, Ms Prosser, and address the withdrawal and dismissal of all outstanding applications and responses, effectively resolving all matters awaiting hearing.
Judge Harman ordered that X shall live with his father, Mr Sullivan, who was granted sole parental responsibility. X is to spend time with Ms Prosser on terms agreed between the parents. The court also made specific provisions regarding the particulars of these orders, including the consequences of contravention and assistance for compliance, as detailed in an attached Fact Sheet. All prior orders were discharged, and outstanding applications and responses were withdrawn and dismissed. Finally, provisions were made for the return or destruction of exhibits and subpoenaed material upon the expiration of the appeal period, assuming no appeal is lodged.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
SULLIVAN & PROSSER [2014] FCCA 3129
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
2
Allesch v Maunz
[2000] HCA 40
Luxton v Vines
[1952] HCA 19
Johnson & Page
[2007] FamCA 1235