| [2024] FWCA 3320 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Sudel Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2024/3257)
SUDEL INDUSTRIES PTY LTD OLYMPIC DAM ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 24 SEPTEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Sudel Industries Pty Ltd Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sudel Industries Pty Ltd Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Sudel Industries Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 11 September 2024.
On 13 September 2024, I provided the parties with a table of issues to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement which included a BOOT concern with respect to loaded rates for casual employees. The BOOT issue was resolved on the basis of the Applicant’s working roster patterns. The Applicant submitted that the roster is unlikely to change during the life of the Agreement however in the event the roster was altered, submits s.227A of the Act would be applicable to address any future BOOT concern.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 24 September 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526127 PR779456>
- AGLC
- Sudel Industries Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 3320
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3320
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement provided for the mandatory terms as required by section 233 of the Act and whether it was a genuine agreement. The CFMEU argued that the agreement did not meet the statutory minimum entitlements, particularly in relation to pay rates and conditions for certain employees. The employer contended that the agreement was fairly negotiated and met all legal requirements.
The Commission examined the provisions of the agreement and the evidence provided by both parties. It considered whether the agreement contained the mandated terms and if it was a genuine enterprise agreement, free from any improper conduct. After careful consideration, the Commission found that the agreement contained all the required mandatory terms and was a genuine agreement, as it was negotiated in good faith and met the statutory requirements.
Accordingly, the Commission approved the Sudel Industries Pty Ltd Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2024, and it is now a legally binding agreement between the employer and the employees. The employer must implement the agreement, and the employees are bound by its terms. The CFMEU's application to the Commission was dismissed, and the agreement will come into effect on the date of the approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.