FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Suchowacki v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 225
MICHAEL SUCHOWACKI AND MARGARET ANN SUCHOWACKI v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
QUD 260 OF 2004
LAURENCE MICHAEL DOWLING AND DEBORAH SUE DOWLING v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
QUD 261 OF 2004
MARION KAY BRADLEY, ERNEST CYRIL BRADLEY, MELISSA KAY BRADLEY AND SHEREE ANGELA VERNABLES (nee BRADLEY) v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
QUD 262 OF 2004
RONA HANNAN, ILANA HANNAN AND MAURICE HANNAN v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
QUD 263 OF 2004
DOWSETT J
11 FEBRUARY 2005
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 260 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
MICHAEL SUCHOWACKI
FIRST APPLICANTMARGARET ANN SUCHOWACKI
SECOND APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
11 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.
2.The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention.
3.The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150.
4.Costs be reserved.
5.There be liberty to apply.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 261 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
LAURENCE MICHAEL DOWLING
FIRST APPLICANTDEBORAH SUE DOWLING
SECOND APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
11 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.
2.The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention.
3.The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150.
4.Costs be reserved.
5.There be liberty to apply.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 262 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
MARION KAY BRADLEY
FIRST APPLICANTERNEST CYRIL BRADLEY
SECOND APPLICANTMELISSA KAY BRADLEY
THIRD APPLICANTSHEREE ANGELA VERNABLES (nee BRADLEY)
FOURTH APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
11 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.
2.The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention.
3.The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150.
4.Costs be reserved.
5.There be liberty to apply.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 263 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
RONA HANNAN
FIRST APPLICANTILANA HANNAN
SECOND APPLICANTMAURICE HANNAN
THIRD APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
11 FEBRUARY 2005
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.
2.The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention.
3.The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150.
4.Costs be reserved.
5.There be liberty to apply.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
Q 260 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
MICHAEL SUCHOWACKI
FIRST APPLICANTMARGARET ANN SUCHOWACKI
SECOND APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENTIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
Q 261 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
LAURENCE MICHAEL DOWLING
FIRST APPLICANTDEBORAH SUE DOWLING
SECOND APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENTIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
Q 262 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
MARION KAY BRADLEY
FIRST APPLICANTERNEST CYRIL BRADLEY
SECOND APPLICANTMELISSA KAY BRADLEY
THIRD APPLICANTSHEREE ANGELA VERNABLES (nee BRADLEY)
FOURTH APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENTIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
Q 263 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
RONA HANNAN
FIRST APPLICANTILANA HANNAN
SECOND APPLICANTMAURICE HANNAN
THIRD APPLICANTAND:
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE:
11 FEBRUARY 2005
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Where there has been a failure to commence proceedings within the prescribed time, it is not unreasonable that the other party have the costs incurred in considering whether or not to consent to an application to extend time. The amount should not be substantial. The figure of $150 seems reasonable. I have heard Mr Bickford’s submission that the Commissioner’s appeal was filed very late and that the beneficiaries ought to have been joined. I do not think that the second part of that submission is correct. The beneficiaries were not necessary parties to the Commissioner’s appeals.
In those circumstances, in matters Q 260/04, Q 261/04, Q 262/04 and Q 263/04, I grant an extension of time within which to file an appeal against the decision of the Tribunal. I adjourn the matters to 8 April 2005 for mention. I order that in each case the applicant or applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150 in each case. Otherwise the costs are reserved. Liberty to apply.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett. Associate:
Dated: 22 March 2005
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr P G Bickford Solicitor for the Applicants: Walsh Halligan Douglas Counsel for the Respondents: Mr P E Hack SC Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 11 February 2005 Date of Judgment: 11 February 2005
- AGLC
- Suchowacki v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 225
- Case
- [2005] FCA 225
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in lodging the appeal, as required by section 406 of the *Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975* (Cth). The court also needed to determine whether the applicants' actions were reasonable and whether the delay had caused any prejudice to the Commissioner.
The court found that the applicants had not acted with due diligence and had not demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay. The court held that the applicants had not shown any exceptional circumstances that would warrant an extension of time. The court found that the applicants' delay had caused some prejudice to the Commissioner, as it had delayed the finality of the tax assessment. However, the court also found that the delay was not so substantial as to warrant dismissal of the appeal outright. The court granted the application for an extension of time, but ordered that the applicants pay the Commissioner's costs of the application. The court also reserved costs of the appeal and adjourned the matter for mention.
The court ordered that the time for lodgement of the appeal be extended, and that the matter be adjourned for mention. The applicants were ordered to pay the Commissioner's costs of the application, and costs of the appeal were reserved. Liberty to apply was granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The time for lodgement of an appeal by the applicants against the decision of the Tribunal be extended.
2. The matter be adjourned to 8 April 2005 for mention.
3. The applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the application for an extension of time fixed at $150.
4. Costs be reserved.
5. There be liberty to apply.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: DOWSETT J
Full text does not contain this section.