Suarez Vera (Migration)
Case
•
[2022] AATA 1225
•16 February 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Suarez Vera (Migration) [2022] AATA 1225
[2022] AATA 1225
16 February 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa, Subclass 485, in the Graduate Work stream. The applicant sought to satisfy the primary criteria for the visa, specifically clauses 485.221 and 485.222 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The dispute centred on whether the applicant met the requirements of these clauses, which relate to satisfying the Australian study requirement within six months prior to the visa application and having qualifications closely related to the nominated occupation.
The Tribunal was required to determine if the applicant had satisfied the Australian study requirement as defined by regulation 1.15F(1) of the Regulations. This involved assessing whether the applicant had completed one or more registered degrees, diplomas, or trade qualifications awarded by an Australian educational institution, undertaken while in Australia on a study-authorised visa, completed in a total of at least 16 calendar months, and resulting from at least two academic years of study, with all instruction conducted in English. The Tribunal also had to consider whether the qualifications relied upon were completed within the six months immediately preceding the visa application date and whether they were closely related to the applicant's nominated skilled occupation.
The Tribunal found that the applicant had completed a Diploma of Project Management and an Advanced Diploma of Program Management from the Universal Institute of Technology. These qualifications were registered courses completed at a CRICOS registered institution. The Tribunal was satisfied that both courses were completed within the six months immediately before the visa application date, with the Advanced Diploma being completed on 13 August 2019 and the application lodged on 30 August 2019. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant met the requirements of both clause 485.221 and clause 485.222. The Tribunal remitted the application for reconsideration by the Minister, with the direction that the applicant had met these specific criteria.
The Tribunal was required to determine if the applicant had satisfied the Australian study requirement as defined by regulation 1.15F(1) of the Regulations. This involved assessing whether the applicant had completed one or more registered degrees, diplomas, or trade qualifications awarded by an Australian educational institution, undertaken while in Australia on a study-authorised visa, completed in a total of at least 16 calendar months, and resulting from at least two academic years of study, with all instruction conducted in English. The Tribunal also had to consider whether the qualifications relied upon were completed within the six months immediately preceding the visa application date and whether they were closely related to the applicant's nominated skilled occupation.
The Tribunal found that the applicant had completed a Diploma of Project Management and an Advanced Diploma of Program Management from the Universal Institute of Technology. These qualifications were registered courses completed at a CRICOS registered institution. The Tribunal was satisfied that both courses were completed within the six months immediately before the visa application date, with the Advanced Diploma being completed on 13 August 2019 and the application lodged on 30 August 2019. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the applicant met the requirements of both clause 485.221 and clause 485.222. The Tribunal remitted the application for reconsideration by the Minister, with the direction that the applicant had met these specific criteria.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Suarez Vera (Migration) [2022] AATA 1225
Cases Citing This Decision
0