Sturt on behalf of the Jaru Native Title Claim v State of Western Australia

Case

[2018] FCA 1923

6 December 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Sturt on behalf of the Jaru Native Title Claim v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1923 [2018] FCA 1923 6 December 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Sturt on behalf of the Jaru Native Title Claim v State of Western Australia involved a dispute over the recognition of native title by the Jaru People in Western Australia. The case was before the Federal Court of Australia, which was tasked with determining whether the proposed consent determination, which included certain apical ancestors and native title holders, was appropriate under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). An interlocutory application was brought prior to the determination challenging the inclusion of certain apical ancestors, however, the list of apical ancestors was duly authorised by the claim group, satisfying the requirements of section 87A of the Native Title Act.

The legal issues before the court were whether the inclusion of the apical ancestors and native title holders in the proposed consent determination was appropriate and whether the requirements of the Native Title Act had been satisfied. The court found that the requirements of the Act had been satisfied and that it was appropriate to make the orders sought. The Jaru People had persistence and determination in their pursuit of recognition of their native title, and the legal representatives and representative body, the Kimberley Land Council, played an important role in achieving this outcome. The court also acknowledged the support of the State and other active respondents in this outcome.

The court's reasoning was that the requirements of the Native Title Act had been satisfied, and the proposed consent determination provided a permanent record of the recognition of the Jaru People's native title. The court hoped that all Jaru people would see this determination as an opportunity for them to make choices about how best to achieve the protection of their country. The final orders provided that the determination of native title would take effect immediately upon the Court making a determination under sections 56(1) or 57(2) of the Native Title Act, on proper material filed by the Jaru applicant.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Indigenous Peoples & Native Title Law

Legal Concepts

  • Native Title

  • Consent Determination

  • Apical Ancestors